Commonly Prescribed ACE Inhibitors For Hypertension Are Less Effective And Have More Side Effects Compared Than Newer Thiazides
Source:Thailand Medical News Oct 25, 2019 5 years, 4 weeks, 19 hours, 19 minutes ago
Researchers from Columbia University Irving Medical Center have conducted a new multinational study that shows that the most popular first-line treatment for
hypertension ie
ACE inhibitors are less effective and has more side effects than an alternative called
Thiazides that's prescribed much less often. The study also found that non-dihydropyridine
calcium channel blockers were less effective than all of the other first-line drug classes
The team analyzed electronic health records and claims data from nearly 5 million patients who had begun drug treatment for
hypertension and found that patients who were first prescribed
thiazide diuretics had 15% fewer heart attacks, strokes, and hospitalizations for heart failure, compared to those who were prescribed
ACE inhibitors. Patients who began with
thiazides also experienced fewer side effects. The study was published in the Lancet medical journal.
The team estimated that approximately 3,100 major cardiovascular events among the patients who first took
ACE inhibitors could have been avoided had they first been treated with a
thiazide diuretic.
Current medical guidelines for
hypertension recommend starting antihypertensive therapy with any drug from five different classes of medications, including
thiazide diuretics,
ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and non-dihydropyridine
t; calcium channel blockers.
Unfortunately, there is no evidence to help physicians decide which drug class to start with for
hypertension: the literature contains data from randomized, controlled clinical trials encompassing just 31,000 patients and none of them were just beginning antihypertensive treatment. As a result, most
clinical guidelines are based on expert opinion rather than data.
Dr George Hripcsak, chair of biomedical informatics at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and an author of the study commented during an interview with
Thailand Medical News, "Randomized clinical trials demonstrate a drug's effectiveness and safety in a highly defined patient population. But they're not good at making comparisons among multiple drug classes in a diverse group of patients that you would encounter in the real world."
Observational studies can be used to detect effects that might not have been apparent in randomized trials. But many are too small to draw meaningful conclusions or suffer from other types of distortion.
Dr Hripcsak further commented, "Unintentionally or not, journals and authors tend to publish studies that have exciting results, and researchers may even select analytical methods that are best suited to getting the results that fit their hypotheses. It comes down to a cherry-picking exercise, which makes the results less reliable."
The researchers analyze data from millions of patient health records and account for tens of thousands of different variables critical to eliminating confounding factors. The method, known as Large-Scale Evidence Generation and Evaluation across a Network of Databases, or LEGEND, was pioneered by a consortium of scientists participating in the Observational Health Data Science Initiative (OHDSI) network. Using LEGEND, the researchers are able to share their methodology and standardize the data, minimizing bias.
Dr Patrick Ryan, Ph.D., adjunct assistant professor of biomedical informatics at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and vice president, Observational Health Data Analytics, Janssen Research and Development and coauthor also commented to
Thailand Medical News, "LEGEND provides a systematic framework that can reproducibly generate evidence by applying advanced analytics across a network of disparate databases for a wide array of exposures and outcomes,". "Not only does LEGEND offer a path to scale to the real needs of the healthcare community, it also provides the complementary diagnostics to help us understand how much we can trust the evidence we've produced."
The study analyzed insurance claims and electronic health records from 4.9 million patients with
hypertension in four countries who were starting antihypertensive therapy with a single drug. The researchers used a complex algorithm to identify the number of heart attacks, hospitalizations for heart failure, strokes, and nearly 50 medication side effects occurring in patients taking any of the first-line antihypertensive drugs. They also employed a number of techniques designed to minimize bias and account for about 60,000 different variables.
The study found that
ACE inhibitors were the first antihypertensive drug prescribed to 48% of patients, compared with 17% of patients who were first prescribed
thiazide diuretics. Yet patients who were first treated with thiazide diuretics had 15% fewer heart attacks, hospitalizations for heart failure, and strokes compared with those treated with other first-line therapies. In addition, patients first treated with
ACE inhibitors had higher rates of 19 side effects compared with
thiazide users.
Common
ACE inhibitors for
hypertension include benazepril (Lotensin), captopril (Capoten), enalapril (Vasotec), fosinopril (Monopril), lisinopril (Zestril), quinapril (Accupril), ramipril (Altace), moexipril (Univasc), perindopril (Aceon) and trandolapril (Mavik)
Examples of
calcium channel blockers include: Amlodipine (Norvasc), Diltiazem (Cardizem, Tiazac, others), Felodipine,Isradipine, Nicardipine, Nifedipine (Adalat CC, Procardia), Nisoldipine (Sular) and Verapamil (Calan, Verelan)
There are three types of diuretics: Oral
Thiazide, Loop and Potassium sparing.
Each type affects a different part of your kidneys. Some pills combine more than one type of diuretic or combine a diuretic with another
high blood pressure medication.
Which
thiazide diuretic is best for you depends on your health and the condition being treated.
Examples of oral
thiazide diuretics include: Chlorothiazide (Diuril), Chlorthalidone, Hydrochlorothiazide (Microzide), Indapamide, Metolazone
Examples of loop diuretics include: Bumetanide (Bumex), Ethacrynic acid (Edecrin), Furosemide (Lasix), Torsemide (Demadex)
Examples of potassium-sparing diuretics include: Amiloride,Eplerenone (Inspra), Spironolactone (Aldactone, Carospir),Triamterene (Dyrenium)
High blood pressure or
hypertension patients currently on
ACE Inhibitors or non-dihydropyridine
calcium channel blockers should consult their physicians should they wish to choose to switch to
Thiazides.
Reference: Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis , Lancet, Prof Marc A Suchard, MD ,Martijn J Schuemie, PhD,Prof Harlan M Krumholz, MD, Seng Chan You, MD,RuiJun Chen, MD,Nicole Pratt, PhD et al.,Published: October 24, 2019DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32317-7