Word-Finding Challenges Linked to Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

Medical News: The aftereffects of COVID-19 have been well-documented, with a range of lingering symptoms observed in patients who have recovered from the acute phase of the disease. Among these symptoms, cognitive impairments, particularly related to language, have garnered increased attention from researchers. A study led by researchers from the Department of Psychology at the University of Oviedo in Spain has focused on examining specific language challenges experienced by individuals suffering from post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS). This Medical News report delves into the findings of their research, which sheds light on the word-retrieval difficulties these patients face.


Word-Finding Challenges Linked to Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

Word-Finding Issues in Post-COVID-19 Patients
The research team aimed to investigate the lexical retrieval difficulties in PCS patients, using a combination of verbal fluency and naming tasks to assess language performance. The study involved 195 PCS patients aged 26 to 64, compared with 50 healthy individuals, aged 25 to 61, who served as the control group.
 
Participants were assessed using various tasks designed to explore their ability to retrieve words and produce language. These included two semantic tasks, three naming tasks, and four verbal fluency tasks. Across all these assessments, PCS patients demonstrated markedly poorer performance compared to the control group. They generated fewer words overall, and the words they chose were typically simpler and more accessible.
 
The Study’s Findings
The study found that PCS patients struggled with word retrieval in several areas, especially in verbal fluency tasks. The differences between the PCS group and the control group were stark. On average, PCS patients generated significantly fewer words, indicating that their language faculties had been impaired.
 
The most notable difficulties were seen in tasks requiring semantic fluency, where patients were asked to generate as many words as possible within a specific category (for example, animals). PCS patients consistently performed worse than the control group, producing not only fewer words but also choosing simpler, more commonly used words. This suggests a reduction in their ability to access more complex language.
 
In naming tasks, PCS patients made more errors than the control group. These errors included non-responses, where the patient could not retrieve the word at all, and semantic errors, where a related but incorrect word was chosen. For example, a patient might name “hippo” instead of “rhino” when shown a picture of a rhinoceros. This underscores the specific challenges that PCS patients face in accessing their lexical memory.
 
Cognitive Reserve and Language Performance
Interestingly, the study also found that younger PCS patients tended to perform worse than older patients, a result that may seem counterintuitive. Typically, younger individuals are expected to have a higher cognitive reserve, which refers to the brain’s ability to compensate for damage or dysfunction. However, in this study, younger patients showed more significant impairments in word retrieval than their older counterparts.
 
One potential explanation is that older patients, who often have higher educational attainment or more extensive vocabularies due to life experience, may rely on a greater cognitive reserve to offset the language impairments caused by PCS. Younger patients, by contrast, may not have had as much time to build this cognitive reserve, leaving them more vulnerable to the cognitive symptoms of PCS.
 
Detailed Task Assessments
The study employed various assessments to examine language difficulties in PCS patients. These included:

-Semantic Fluency Tasks: In these tasks, participants were asked to generate as many words as possible within a specific category. PCS patients performed worse in every task, producing fewer words that were generally simpler and more commonly used than those generated by the control group.
 
-Naming Tasks: PCS patients were asked to name objects, actions, or concepts. Again, they performed worse than the control group, making more errors and taking longer to retrieve the correct words. The errors included non-responses, where patients were unable to produce any word, and errors where patients chose related but incorrect words.
 
-Psycholinguistic Variables: The study also looked at factors like word frequency (how commonly a word is used), familiarity, and concreteness (how easy it is to picture the concept the word describes). PCS patients tended to choose words that were more frequent, familiar, and concrete, reflecting a reliance on simpler language due to their impaired word-retrieval abilities.
 
Implications of the Study
The findings of this study have important implications for both the diagnosis and treatment of PCS. By highlighting specific language impairments, the researchers stress the need for targeted cognitive rehabilitation strategies to address these deficits. Patients with PCS should undergo thorough language assessments to identify areas of difficulty, particularly in lexical retrieval.
 
Moreover, the study suggests that rehabilitation programs should be tailored to individual patients. Those with lower cognitive reserve, such as younger patients or those with lower educational attainment, may require more intensive interventions to help them rebuild their language faculties. Rehabilitation strategies could include exercises that help patients access more complex vocabulary, as well as activities that improve their verbal fluency and overall cognitive functioning.
 
Study Limitations and Future Research
While the study provides significant insights into the language difficulties experienced by PCS patients, there are some limitations. The researchers conducted the assessments online due to COVID-19 restrictions, which may have affected the results. The online format may not have been as effective for assessing certain cognitive functions, and patients’ performance could have been influenced by factors such as internet connectivity or the home environment.
 
Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of PCS on language performance. While this study focused on patients in the early stages of recovery, it remains unclear whether these impairments will improve over time or if they represent permanent damage. Additionally, future studies should investigate how these language difficulties interact with other cognitive symptoms of PCS, such as memory loss or attention deficits.
 
Conclusion
The study from the University of Oviedo sheds new light on the cognitive impairments associated with post-COVID-19 syndrome, particularly in the area of language. Word retrieval difficulties are a significant problem for PCS patients, affecting their ability to communicate effectively. Younger patients, in particular, seem to be more affected by these issues, possibly due to a lower cognitive reserve compared to their older counterparts.
 
Moving forward, it is crucial for healthcare providers to conduct comprehensive language assessments for PCS patients and develop personalized rehabilitation programs to address these specific impairments. By focusing on rebuilding patients’ language abilities, it may be possible to improve their quality of life and help them recover more fully from the cognitive aftereffects of COVID-19.
 
The study findings were published in the peer-reviewed International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.13118
 
For the latest COVID-19 News, keep on logging to Thailand Medical News.
 
Read Also:
https://www.thailandmedical.news/news/eeg-studies-show-that-even-mild-covid-19-infections-can-affect-brain-cognitive-functions
 
https://www.thailandmedical.news/news/university-of-california-researchers-warn-that-covid-19-induced-vascular-dysfunctions-contribute-to-long-covid-cognitive-deficits